Continuous Inkjet (CIJ) or Laser?

There is no right or wrong answer.
They both get the job done.
Professionally.


 
It's crucial to choose the right coding solution for your beverage containers. It's more complex than comparing CAPEX and OPEX. Factors like coding speed, print visibility and contrast, Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) considerations, branding, and product shape and size also come into play. To achieve a balance between cost and print quality, you must have a complete understanding of all available solutions.
 
Let us help you with your options.

 

“From day one, we’ve had nothing but great experiences with Markem-Imaje. We’re pleased with the quality of the printer, and it will be able to keep up with our needs as we grow.”
Exhibit ‘A’
- Craft beer manufacturer
“It was crucial for us to find a supplier that could cover the extremely wide range of packaging we use for our products. With Markem-Imaje we found the partner we were looking for.”
- Raffaele Bini, Engineering Manager Sanpellegrino
9750 Expert Series inkjet solutions.
Continuous inkjet printing is a great option for applications requiring high-speed printing, flexibility, and excellent contrast coding and visibility. Although operating expenses are perceived to be greater than laser, continuous inkjet printing is the ideal choice for specific applications and can result in being the most cost-effective choice.
SmartLase® CO2, Fiber, and UV laser solutions.
As counterfeiting continues to rise, beverage companies require permanent solutions that cannot be tampered with. Although the initial investment in a laser printer may be high, the benefits outweigh the costs. While CIJ printing provides good adhesion and permanence, laser printing is a reliable and 100% permanent solution for most of your beverage containers.
Fill out the form above to download our Beverage brochure on how to choose the most cost-effective coder for your beverage containers.

© 2023 Markem-Imaje, a Dover Company. All rights reserved.

Connect with us: